
The U.S. tariff landscape has shifted again and sourcing teams in the luggage and travel goods industry need to recalibrate quickly.
After the Supreme Court struck down the Trump administration’s emergency tariff authority, the White House introduced a new temporary global tariff. Meanwhile, trade negotiations, Section 232 expansions, and the possibility of new Section 301 investigations are reshaping risk exposure across Asia.
Here’s what buyers, importers, and sourcing managers need to understand now.
February 2026 Reset: IEEPA Tariffs End, Section 122 Begins
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (6–3) that President Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) when imposing global tariffs.
As a result:
All IEEPA tariffs were officially terminated.
U.S. Customs ended IEEPA duty collection at 12:00 a.m. ET on February 24, 2026.
However, the reset was immediate and strategic.
On the same day, President Trump issued a Proclamation imposing a new:
10% global tariff on all U.S. imports under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
This new tariff took effect at 12:01 a.m. ET on February 24, 2026.
The 10% Section 122 tariff:
Applies to imports from every country
Is applied in addition to normal HTS duties
Stacks on top of any existing Section 301 or Section 232 tariffs
President Trump has publicly stated the rate could increase to 15%, but as of February 26, the enforced rate remains 10%.
Section 122 tariffs are temporary.
They automatically expire after 150 days unless Congress approves an extension.
That means:
The current 10% global tariff will expire on July 24, 2026, unless extended.
However, administration officials have indicated they may use this 150-day window to initiate new Section 301 investigations — potentially reinstating higher country-specific tariffs before July.
For sourcing teams, this means the current 10% rate may not represent long-term stability.
Although the Supreme Court ruled IEEPA tariffs unlawful, it did not address refunds.
The case must now move:
Back to the Federal Appeals Court
Then to the Court of International Trade (CIT)
Where a decision on refunds will be issued
A ruling may not come until late Spring 2026 at the earliest.
Refund eligibility may depend on procedural status.
CBP may deny refunds for entries already liquidated.
Administrative delays are likely even if refunds are ordered.
Over $175 billion in duties across 300,000+ importers would need processing.
To preserve potential refund rights:
Protest the liquidation of all entries affected by former IEEPA tariffs.
File protests even for entries already liquidated.
Failure to file could jeopardize eligibility if refunds are later authorized.
Prior to the February reset, the U.S. and China reached a trade agreement that lowered tariffs on Chinese travel goods.
Effective November 10:
Fentanyl-related tariffs dropped from 20% to 10%.
Total tariffs fell from approximately 73% to 63%.
Additional port fees on Chinese-operated vessels were suspended through 2026.
The 10% reciprocal (IEEPA) tariff remained in place at the time.
Now, with IEEPA removed and replaced by Section 122:
China is subject to the same 10% global tariff — plus existing Section 301 and Section 232 duties where applicable.
The deal marked the first meaningful tariff rollback since 2020.
On August 18, 2025, Section 232 tariffs expanded to cover 407 additional steel and aluminum products.
For travel goods manufacturers, this affects:
Luggage frames
Telescopic handles
Reinforced wheel housings
Structural metal components
Steel and aluminum tariffs remain:
50% for most countries
25% for the United Kingdom
Metal-reinforced luggage designs may continue facing elevated input costs.
On August 27, the U.S. imposed a 25% tariff on certain imports from India related to Russian oil purchases.
At that time, total duties on Indian travel goods reached approximately 50%.
Under the February 24 reset:
India now falls under the 10% Section 122 tariff (unless otherwise subject to 232 or 301).
However, future Section 301 investigations could re-escalate country-specific rates.
Despite tariff resets, compliance rules remain strict.
“Substantial transformation” standards remain unchanged.
Minor assembly or transshipment does not change country of origin.
Transshipped goods may face penalties up to 40%.
Enforcement definitions remain vague — especially under prior Vietnam agreements.
As of August 29, 2025:
All shipments are subject to duties.
Low-value exemptions no longer apply.
Beyond tariffs, sourcing teams continue facing:
$50/ton surcharges on China shipments (since October 2025)
Container and chassis tariffs impacting freight rates
Reduced Asia–U.S. route capacity
Ongoing port congestion volatility
Even as headline tariff rates fall, total landed costs remain elevated.
While the Supreme Court eliminated IEEPA authority, tariff risk has not disappeared — it has evolved.
The administration has demonstrated willingness to pivot between:
IEEPA
Section 122
Section 301
Section 232
For sourcing teams, this suggests:
Tariff volatility may remain structural in 2026.
Supplier contracts signed now may require flexibility clauses.
Diversification is no longer just cost-driven — it is risk-driven.
The next few months are likely to bring:
New Section 301 investigations
Public hearings
Possible re-escalation before July 24
Strategic sourcing decisions should account for this uncertainty.
To reduce exposure in 2026:
Misclassification risk increases during tariff transitions.
Preserve refund eligibility.
Build contingency budgets for possible 15% or renewed 301 tariffs.
Explore suppliers in lower-risk regions.
Include tariff adjustment clauses.
Expect investigations before July 24.
Useful sources: